Mots-clés
Neurosis de Ansiedad ×
Afficher plus Mots-clés
Table des matières
  1. 1. Essai clinique
  2. 2. Routinedokumentation
  3. 3. Études de registres/cohortes
  4. 4. Assurance qualité
  5. 5. Standard de données
  6. 6. Questionnaire pour les patients
  7. 7. Spécialité médicale
Modèles de données sélectionnés

Vous devez être connecté pour sélectionner plusieurs modèles de données, les télécharger ou les analyser.

- 22/07/2020 - 1 Formulaire, 1 Groupe Item, 22 Eléments de données, 1 Langue
Groupe Item: Self-Consciousness Scale--(SCS-R)
Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S.. (2013). Self-Consciousness Scale--(SCS-R). Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science. Retrieved 22.07.2020 from www.midss.ie Key references: Martin, A. J., & Debus, R. L. (1999). Alternative factor structure for the Revised Self-Consciousness Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 72(2), 266-281 Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1985). The Self-Consciousness Scale: A revised version for use with general populations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15, 687-699. Primary use / Purpose: A revised measure of public and private self-consciousness Background: Private self-consciousness is a tendency to introspect and examine one's inner self and feelings. Public self-consciousness is an awareness of the self as it is viewed by others. This kind of self-consciousness can result in self-monitoring and social anxiety. Both private and public self-consciousness are viewed as personality traits that are relatively stable over time, but they are not correlated. Just because an individual is high on one dimension doesn't mean that he or she is high on the other. Self-consciousness can strongly influence behaviour. As well as public and private self-consciousness, the Self-Conciousness Scale (SCS-R) measures social anxiety. This revised scale is applicable to more general populations. Psychometrics: The Cronbach's alpha for private self-consciousness was found to be .75, for public self-consciousness it was .84, and for social anxiety .79. These alphas compared favorably to those of the original scale. The test-retest correlation for the private subscale was .76, for the public subscale .74, and for the social anxiety subscale .77. These suggest that the scale possesses reasonable stability over time. Web link to tool: http://www.psy.cmu.edu/people/scheier.html Digital Object Identifier (DOI): http://dx.doi.org/10.13072/midss.613 Scoring Procedures: 1. Reverse code items 8 and 11. 2. Computing subscales: a) For private Self-Consciousness subscale: Sum items 1, 4, 6, 8, 12, 14, 17, 19 and 21. b) For public Self-Consciousness subscale: Sum items 2, 5, 10, 13, 16, 18 and 20. c) For Social Anxiety subscale: Sum items 3, 7, 9, 11, 15 and 22. Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1985). The Self-Consciousness Scale: A revised version for use with general populations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15, 687-699.
- 22/07/2020 - 1 Formulaire, 1 Groupe Item, 12 Eléments de données, 1 Langue
Groupe Item: Social Physique Anxiety Scale (SPAS)
Leary, M. R.. (2013). Social Physique Anxiety Scale (SPAS). Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science. Retrieved 22.07.2020 from www.midss.ie Key references: Hart, E. A., Leary, M. R., & Rejeski, W. J. (1989). The measurement of social physique anxiety. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11, 94-104. Primary use / Purpose: This scale measures social anxiety related to physique. By physique or figure we mean your body’s form and structure; specifically, body fat, muscular tone, and general body proportions. Background: The pressures placed on young men and women to portray an ideal physique are predominant social forces in today’s society. A failure to live up to these standards, whether real or imagined, may induce thoughts and feelings that others are negatively evaluating one’s physique. In this case, social physique anxiety may be experienced (SPA; Hart, Leary, & Rejeski, 1989). Subsequently, individuals who are concerned that others are or may be judging their physiques negatively (i.e., SPA) may feel pressured by society’s ideals to engage in physical activity to enhance their physique and decrease the chances of negative evaluations.The Social Physique Anxiety Scale (SPAS) a 12-item self-report scale developed to assess the degree to which people become anxious when others observe or evaluate their physiques. Psychometrics: The Social Physique Anxiety Scale (SPAS) demonstrated both high internal and test-retest reliability. It also correlated appropriately with concerns regarding others' evaluations and with feelings about one's body. Validity data showed that women who scored high on the SPAS were heavier and had a higher percentage of body fat than those who scored lower. In addition, high scorers reported significantly greater anxiety during a real evaluation of their physiques, further supporting the validity of the scale. Web link to tool: http://people.duke.edu/~leary/scales.html Digital Object Identifier (DOI): http://dx.doi.org/10.13072/midss.598
- 21/07/2020 - 1 Formulaire, 1 Groupe Item, 5 Eléments de données, 1 Langue
Groupe Item: Fear of Physician (FOP)
- 21/07/2020 - 1 Formulaire, 1 Groupe Item, 20 Eléments de données, 1 Langue
Groupe Item: Classroom Anxiety Measure
Richmond, V. P.. (2013). Classroom Anxiety Measure. Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science. Retrieved 21.07.2020 from www.midss.ie Key references: Richmond, V. P., Wrench, J. S., & Gorham, J.(2001).Communication, affect, and learning in the classroom. Acton, MA: Tapestry Press Primary use / Purpose: This instrument can be used to measure a student's anxiety in the classroom. Background: The Classroom Anxiety Measure (CAM) is based on Richmond's Situational Communication Apprehension Measure developed by McCroskey and Richmond (1982, 1985) to measure state communication apprehension in any context. Psychometrics: You can expect an alpha reliability on this measure of about .90. For more information on psychometric properties of instrument see Richmond, V. P., Wrench, J. S., & Gorham, J.(2001).Communication, affect, and learning in the classroom. Acton, MA: Tapestry Press. Web link to tool: http://www.jamescmccroskey.com/measures/classroom_anxiety.htm Digital Object Identifier (DOI): http://dx.doi.org/10.13072/midss.502 This instrument can be used to measure a student's anxiety in the classroom. It is based on Richmond's Situational Communication Apprehension Measure. You can expect an alpha reliability on this measure of about .90. SCORING: To compute your scores, add your scores for each item as indicated below: Recode questions 3, 4, 6, 10, 12, 13, 15, 16, 18, 19 with the following format: 1=5 2=4 3=3 4=2 5=1 After you have recoded the previous questions, add all of the numbers together to get your composite Classroom Anxiety score. Score should be between 20 and 100. Scores of 80 and above indicate high classroom anxiety; Scores of 25 and below indicate low test or evaluation apprehension; Scores between 26 and 79 indicate moderate test or evaluation apprehension.
- 10/06/2020 - 1 Formulaire, 2 Groupes Item, 29 Eléments de données, 1 Langue
Groupes Item: Administrative Data, NSPS
Moscovitch, D.A., & Huyder, V.. (2012) . Negative Self-Portrayal Scale (NSPS). Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science. Retrieved 10.06.2020 from www.midss.ie Scoring the NSPS: 1. Sum items 3, 10, 12, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24 for concerns about social competence Subscale Score 2. Sum items 1, 4, 6, 7, 8, 15, 16, 25 for concerns about signs of anxiety Subscale Score 3. Sum items 2, 5, 9, 11, 13, 22, 26, 27 for concerns about physical appearance Subscale Score 4. Sum all items (or all subscales) for NSPS Total Score Key references: Moscovitch, D.A., & Huyder, V. (2011). The negative self-portrayal scale: Development, validation, and application to social anxiety. Behavior Therapy, 42, 183-196, doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2010.04.007. Primary use / Purpose: The Negative Self-Portrayal Scale (NSPS) is an inventory designed to examine the degree to which individuals are concerned that specific self-attributes they view as being inferior will be scrutinized and negatively evaluated by critical others in social situations. More precisely, it assesses individuals for their concerns with social competency, physical appearance, and signs of anxiety. Background: Individual differences in social anxiety and avoidance behaviors have been posited to underlie differences in the extent to which individuals worry about their perceived deficient self-attributes. The NSPS was created to tap the factors underpinning social interaction and performance anxiety and related constructs. The NSPS has utility for both clinical research and practice. Psychometrics: The NSPS has been shown to have good internal consistency and test-retest reliability, strong convergent validity, and adequate discriminant validity (Moscovitch & Huyder, 2011).
- 31/05/2020 - 1 Formulaire, 3 Groupes Item, 42 Eléments de données, 1 Langue
Groupes Item: Distressed or upset, description, Emotions, RTQ-31 (state, past)
McEvoy, P. M., Mahoney, A. J., & Moulds, M. (2010). The Repetitive Thinking Questionnaire. Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science. Retrieved 24.05.2020, from www.midss.ie Key references: McEvoy, P. M., Mahoney, A. J., & Moulds, M. (2010). Are worry, rumination, and post-event processing one and the same? Development of the Repetitive Thinking Questionnaire, Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 24, 509-515. Mahoney, A. E. J., McEvoy, P. M., & Moulds, M. L. (2012). Psychometric Properties of the Repetitive Thinking Questionnaire in a Clinical Sample. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 26, 359-367. The 10 emotion items are taken from the Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) – Negative affect subscale. Reference: Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070. Primary use / Purpose: The Repetitive Thinking Questionnaire was developed to assess constructs related to repetitive negative thinking and rumination, such as cognitive avoidance, thought suppression, metacognitions, and thought control strategies. Background: It has been suggested that repetitive negative thinking is a transdiagnostic phenomenon. Typically, worry, rumination, and post-event processing have been assessed using disparate measures. The RTQ was developed to unify these constructs under one assessment scale, and facilitate the identification of transdiagnostic maintaining factors of RNT. Psychometrics: Test reliability is presented in McEvoy, Mahoney, & Moulds (2010). Keywords: Anxiety, Family Digital Object Identifier (DOI): http://dx.doi.org/10.13072/midss.157 Scoring the RTQ-31 (state, past) Simply sum the following items to create the two subscales: - Absence of Repetitive Thinking: Items 2, 14, 18, 20 - Repetitive Negative Thinking: All other items
- 14/05/2020 - 1 Formulaire, 2 Groupes Item, 20 Eléments de données, 1 Langue
Groupes Item: General Information Section, Statements

Do you need help on how to use the search function? Please watch the corresponding tutorial video for more details and learn how to use the search function most efficiently.

Watch Tutorial