Reset filter
Palavras-chave
E05.318.308.750 ×
Mostrar mais Palavras-chave
Índice
  1. 1. Test clinico
  2. 2. Documentazione di routine
  3. 3. Registro / studio di coorte
  4. 4. Garanzia di qualità
  5. 5. Dati Standard
  6. 6. Risultato segnalato dal paziente
  7. 7. Specialità mediche
Modelos de dados selecionados

Deve ter sessão iniciada para selecionar vários modelos de dados e para os transferir ou analisar.

98 Resultados da pesquisa.
Relevância Avaliação Novos primeiro Antigos primeiro

Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science (MIDSS) - The Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain (KASRP)

- 12/01/21 - 1 Formulário, 4 Grupos de itens, 39 Elementos de dados, 1 Idioma
Grupos de itens: Pain, Health Surveys, Pain, Health Surveys, Pain, Case, Pain, Case
Ferrell, B. & McCaffery, M. (2012). The Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain (KASRP). Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science. Retrieved 12.01.2021, from www.midss.ie. Key references: “Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain” developed by Betty Ferrell, RN, PhD, FAAN and Margo McCaffery, RN, MS, FAAN, (http://prc.coh.org), revised 2012. Ferrell, B. R. (2007). Reducing barriers to pain assessment and management: An institutional perspective. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 10(1S), S15-S18. DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2007.9828. McCaffery, M., Ferrell, B. R., Pasero, C. (2000). Nurses' personal opinions about patients' pain and their effect on recorded assessments and titration of opioid doses. Pain Management Nursing, 1(3): 79-87 Primary use / Purpose: The Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain (KASRP) is a 37-item questionnaire. It contains 21 true or false questions and 16 multiple choice ones. Its purpose is to measure the attitudes and knowledge of caregivers on the subject of pain. It is particularly useful as a pre/post test measure and can be used to rate learning outcomes following educational programs on pain. Background: Chronic pain is a debilitating and often incurable problem for many. Palliative care-givers also routinely meet the need for effective treatment of pain in terminally ill patients. Effective care-giving is important in ensuring the wellbeing of these patients. Without sufficient training caregivers will struggle to meet the demands of dealing with chronic pain patients. The Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain (KASRP) is therefore a useful tool for specifically evaluating the knowledge of caregivers on the subject of pain. Psychometrics: The psychometric properties of the Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain (KASRP) are discussed in the introduction to the scale which is attached below. Digital Object Identifier (DOI): http://dx.doi.org/10.13072/midss.341

Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science (MIDSS) - The Patient Pain Questionnaire (PPQ)

- 12/01/21 - 1 Formulário, 3 Grupos de itens, 16 Elementos de dados, 1 Idioma
Grupos de itens: Instructions, Knowledge, Experience
The City of Hope Pain & Palliative Care Resource Center. (2012) . The Patient Pain Questionnaire (PPQ) . Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science. Retrieved 12.01.2021, from www.midss.ie Key references: Ferrell, B. R., Ferrell, B., Rhiner, M., Grant, M. (1991). Family Factors Influencing Cancer Pain. Post Graduate Medical Journal, 67 (Suppl 2), 64-69. Ferrell, B. R., Rhiner, M., Cohen, M., Grant, M. (1991). Pain as a Metaphor for Illness. Part I: Impact of Cancer Pain on Family Caregivers. Oncology Nursing Forum, 18(8), 1303-1309. Ferrell, B. R., Cohen, M., Rhiner, M., Rozak, A. (1991). Pain as a Metaphor for Illness. Part II: Family Caregivers' Management of Pain. Oncology Nursing Forum,18(8), 1315-1321. Ferrell, B. R., Rhiner, M., Ferrell, B. (1993). Development and Implementation of a Pain Education Program. Cancer, 72(11), 3426-3432. Primary use / Purpose: The Patient Pain Questionnaire (PPQ) is a 16-item ordinal inventory. Its purpose is to measure the knowledge and experience of a cancer patient in managing chronic pain. Background: Cancer pain is recognised as a serious barrier to mental wellbeing in cancer patients. One of the main aims of palliative care is to buffer patients against pain, both mental and physical. By using the Patient Pain Questionnaire (PPQ) and also the related family pain questionnaire (FPQ) clinicians and researchers can gain a clearer understanding of the patient/caregiver perspective and how this might interact with or even predict wellbeing or adjustment to pain. The PPQ can be used by either clinicans or researchers. Psychometrics: The psychometric properties of the Patient Pain Questionnaire (PPQ) are discussed in the introduction to the instrument itself which is attached below. Digital Object Identifier (DOI): http://dx.doi.org/10.13072/midss.332

Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science (MIDSS) - The Controlling Pain Vignettes Survey (CPVS) - Patient Vital Signs Vignettes

- 12/01/21 - 4 Formulários, 3 Grupos de itens, 17 Elementos de dados, 1 Idioma
Grupos de itens: General information qualifier, Health Professional, Patient Information, Patient Information
McCaffery, M., Ferrell, B. R., & O'Neil-Page, E.. (2012) . The Controlling Pain Vignettes Survey (CPVS) . Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science. Retrieved 12.01.2021, from www.midss.ie Key references: McCaffery, M. & Ferrell, B. R. (1991). How would you respond to these patients in pain? Nursing 91, June, 34-37. McCaffery, M. & Ferrell, B. R. (1991). Patient age: Does it affect your pain-control decisions? Nursing, 91, September, 44-48. McCaffery, M. & Ferrell, B. R. (1992). How vital are vital signs? Nursing 92, January, 43-46. McCaffery, M., Ferrell, B. R., & and O'Neil-Page, E. (1992). Does life style affect your pain-control decisions? Nursing 92, April, 58, 60-61. Primary use / Purpose: The Controlling Pain Vignettes Survey (CPVS) is a four part survey in which nurses are presented with four pairs of patients as hypothetical case studies. The four pairs of patients differ according to four criteria: behaviour, age, vital signs, and lifestyle. The purpose of the survey is to measure the influence of these four criteria on nurse's assessments of patient pain. Background: Nurses are forced to make difficult decisions when presented with patients who are experiencing pain. Ethical dilemmas can also arise around issues such over-medication, under-medication, and opioid side effects to name a few. It is important to gain an understanding of how nurses make these decisions so that more insight can be gained into the factors influencing those decision making processes. This survey is the product of four separate studies, each investigating one specific factor which may be influential during nurses’ assessments of patient pain. Digital Object Identifier (DOI): http://dx.doi.org/10.13072/midss.330

The Controlling Pain Vignettes Survey (CPVS) - Patient Behavior Vignettes

3 Grupos de itens 17 Elementos de dados

The Controlling Pain Vignettes Survey (CPVS) - Life Style Vignettes

3 Grupos de itens 17 Elementos de dados

The Controlling Pain Vignettes Survey (CPVS) - Patient Age Vignettes

3 Grupos de itens 17 Elementos de dados

SEED Studie - BFI-2-XS MS

- 09/12/20 - 1 Formulário, 1 Grupo de itens, 20 Elementos de dados, 1 Idioma
Grupo de itens: IG.1
Das "Big Five Inventory" ist ein Persönlichkeitsfragebogen welches die Persönlichkeit auf den "Big 5" abbildet. Der hier verwendete Fragebogen ist die 15-Item Extra-Kurzversion mit jeweils 3 Items pro Persönlichkeitsdimension. BFI-2 items copyright 2015 by Oliver P. John and Christopher J. Soto. German translation developed by Daniel Danner, Beatrice Rammstedt, Matthias Bluemke, List Treiber, Sabrina Berres, Christopher J. Soto, and Oliver P. John.

SEED Studie - BFI-2-S MS

- 09/12/20 - 1 Formulário, 1 Grupo de itens, 35 Elementos de dados, 1 Idioma
Grupo de itens: IG.1
Das "Big Five Inventory" ist ein Persönlichkeitsfragebogen welches die Persönlichkeit auf den "Big 5" abbildet. Der hier verwendete Fragebogen ist die 30-Item Kurzversion mit jeweils 6 Items pro Persönlichkeitsdimension. BFI-2 items copyright 2015 by Oliver P. John and Christopher J. Soto. German translation developed by Daniel Danner, Beatrice Rammstedt, Matthias Bluemke, List Treiber, Sabrina Berres, Christopher J. Soto, and Oliver P. John.

Efficacy and Safety of ADVAIR DISKUS Plus Spiriva HandiHaler Versus Spiriva HandiHaler in COPD NCT00784550 - Subject-Completed Rating Scales & Questionnaires

- 01/12/20 - 1 Formulário, 2 Grupos de itens, 9 Elementos de dados, 1 Idioma
Grupos de itens: Administrative Data, Subject-completed Rating Scales & Questionnaires
Study ID: 111114 Clinical Study ID: 111114 Study Title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, 24-Week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of ADVAIR™ DISKUS™ (Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol Combination Product 250/50mcg Inhalation Powder) BID Plus Spiriva HandiHaler (Tiotropium Bromide Inhalation Powder 18mcg) QD Versus Spiriva QD Plus Placebo DISKUS BID in Subjects with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Patient Level Data: Study Listed on ClinicalStudyDataRequest.com Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00784550 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00784550 Sponsor: GlaxoSmithKline Collaborators: N/A Phase: Phase 3 Study Recruitment Status: Completed Generic Name: N/A Trade Name: Tiotropium Bromide, Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol Study Indication: Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive The purpose of the study is to determine the efficacy and safety of the combination of ADVAIR DISKUS® 250/50mcg (FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE/SALMETEROL COMBINATION PRODUCT) plus SPIRIVA® HANDIHALER® inhaler 18mcg (TIOTROPIUM) compared to SPIRIVA® HANDIHALER® inhaler 18mcg (TIOTROPIUM) in patients with COPD. There are a total of 6 visits: Screening (Visit 1), Randomization (Visit 2), and after 4 (Visit 3), 8 (Visit 4), 16 (Visit 5) and 24 (Visit 6) weeks of treatment. This form (Subject-Completed Rating Scales & Questionnaires) is to be filled out at Visit 2, 4 and 6 and/or in case of Early Withdrawal.

Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science (MIDSS) - The Clinical Decision Making Survey (CDMS)

- 11/10/20 - 1 Formulário, 15 Grupos de itens, 69 Elementos de dados, 1 Idioma
Grupos de itens: Instruction, Pain intensity, Evaluation Method, Pain, Question (Inquiry), Pain intensity (observable entity), rating scale; Pain relief, rating scale, Analgesics, Analgesics, Today, Change of medication, Pain, Evaluation, Documentation, Pain, Prescriptions, Non-drug, Order (action), Pain, Contact with, Physicians, Pain relief, Optimum, Problem, Pain, Decision, Pain management, Conflict (Psychology), Demography, Nurses, Patient
Ferrell, B. R., Eberts, M. T., McCaffery, M., Grant, M.. (2012) . The Clinical Decision Making Survey (CDMS) . Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science. Retrieved 10.10.2020, from www.midss.ie Key references: Ferrell, B. R., Eberts, M. T., McCaffery, M., Grant, M. (1991). Clinical decision making and pain. Cancer Nurs. 1991 Dec;14(6):289-97. Primary use / Purpose: The Clinical Decision Making Survey (CDMS) is a 14-item survey. Its purpose is to obtain information from nurses relating to their decision making processes when they are dealing with patients who are experiencing pain. Background: Nurses are forced to make difficult decisions when presented with patients who are experiencing pain. Ethical dilemmas can also arise around issues such over-medication, under-medication, and opioid side effects to name a few. It is important to gain an understanding of how nurses make these decisions so that more insight can be gained into the factors influencing those decision making processes. Digital Object Identifier (DOI): http://dx.doi.org/10.13072/midss.329

Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science (MIDSS) - The Pregnancy Related Beliefs Questionnaire (PRBQ)

- 30/09/20 - 1 Formulário, 2 Grupos de itens, 54 Elementos de dados, 1 Idioma
Grupos de itens: Instructions, Belief
Moorhead, S. R. J., Owens, J., Scott, J. (2003). The Pregnancy Related Beliefs Questionnaire (PRBQ). Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science. Retrieved 29.09.2020, from www.midss.ie Key references: Moorhead, S. R. J., Owens, J., and Scott, J. (2003). DEVELOPMENT AND PILOTING OF THE PREGNANCY RELATED BELIEFS QUESTIONNAIRE (PRBQ). Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 31, 207-213. doi:10.1017/S1352465803002091 Primary use / Purpose: The Pregnancy Related Beliefs Questionnaire (PRBQ) is a 54-item inventory rated on 7 point Likert-type scale. Its purpose is to measure women’s' beliefs about pregnancy and make similar contributions as existing scales towards greater understanding and prediction of postnatal depression Background: Psychological measures have proven disappointing in the prediction of postnatal depression in women. To address this weakness, Moorhead, Owens, and Scott (2003) developed the Pregnancy Related Beliefs Questionnaire (PRBQ). The PRBQ was shown to correlate with several other constructs as measured by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale, and the Cognitive Adaption to Stressful Events Questionnaire (CASE), as well as showing early potential in the prediction of postnatal depression. Psychometrics: The psychometric properties of the Pregnancy Related Beliefs Questionnaire (PRBQ) are discussed in Moorhead, Owens, and Scott (2003). Digital Object Identifier (DOI): http://dx.doi.org/10.13072/midss.323

Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ)

- 26/08/20 - 1 Formulário, 6 Grupos de itens, 19 Elementos de dados, 1 Idioma
Grupos de itens: Administrative, 1. Has there ever been a period of time when you were not your usual self and..., 2. If you checked YES to more than one of the above, have several of these ever happened during the same period of time? Please check 1 response only., 3. How much of a problem did any of these cause you — like being able to work; having family, money, or legal troubles; getting into arguments or fights? Please check 1 response only., 4. Have any of your blood relatives (i.e., children, siblings, parents, grandparents, aunts, uncles) had manic-depressive illness or bipolar disorder?, 5. Has a health professional ever told you that you have manic-depressive illness or bipolar disorder?
Author: Robert M. A. Hirschfeld, M.D., Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, 1.302 Rebecca Sealy, 301 University Blvd., Galveston, TX 77555-0188 e-mail: ude.bmtu@hcsrihor Hirschfeld, Robert M. A.. “The Mood Disorder Questionnaire: A Simple, Patient-Rated Screening Instrument for Bipolar Disorder.” Primary care companion to the Journal of clinical psychiatry vol. 4,1 (2002): 9-11. doi:10.4088/pcc.v04n0104 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC314375/ [Titel anhand dieser PMC-ID in Citavi-Projekt übernehmen] #idm140485826533856title

Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science (MIDSS) - OCD Family Functioning (OFF) Scale - Relative Version

- 19/08/20 - 1 Formulário, 19 Grupos de itens, 129 Elementos de dados, 1 Idioma
Grupos de itens: General Information, relationship to patient, Whom do you live with?, What types of treatment(s) have you tried for your OCD? (check all that apply), Have any of the following people been diagnosed with OCD? If so, who?, Do any of the following people have suspected OCD or Obsessive Compulsive symptoms? If so, who?, Information, Part 1 - Family Functioning Impairment, Part 1 - Family Functioning Impairment, Part 1 - Family Functioning Impairment, Part 1 - Family Functioning Impairment, Part 1 - Family Functioning Impairment, Part 1 - Family Functioning Impairment, Part 1 - Family Functioning Impairment, Part 1 - Family Functioning Impairment, Part 2 - Symptom-Specific Impairment, Part 2 - Symptom-Specific Impairment, Part 3 - Family Role-Specific Impairment, Part 3 - Family Role-Specific Impairment
Stewart, Hu, Hezel, Proujansky, Lamstein, Walsh, Ben-Joseph, Gironda, Jenike, Geller & Pauls. (2012). OCD Family Functioning (OFF) Scale. Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science. Retrieved 19.08.2020 from www.midss.ie Key references: Stewart, E. S., Hu, Y. P., Hezel, D. M., Proujansky, R., Lamstein, A., Walsh, C., … & Pauls, D. L. (2011). Development and psychometric properties of the OCD family functioning (OFF) scale. Journal of Family Psychology, 25, 434-443. Primary use / Purpose: The OFF was developed to explore the content, extent, and perspectives of functional impairment in families affected by OCD. Background: Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) often has a great impact on family functioning. Parents, and other family members, often become involved in the individual's ritualistic behaviours and family accomodation, either through enabling avoidance or assisting ritualistic behaviours, is very common. The OCD Family Functioning (OFF) Scale is a 42 item self-report questionnaire that consists of three major subscales: family functioning impairment, symptom-specific impairment, and family role-specific impairment. It is designed for use with families of adults and children with OCD. Two versions of the scale are available- a patient version and a relative version. The results of the scale may be used to assess family functioning and to help plan interventions and treatments. Scoring is described in Stewart et al. (2011). Psychometrics: The scale's psychometric properties are examined in Stewart et al. (2011). Keywords: Anxiety, Family, Stress Other keywords: obsessive compulsive disorder, OCD, functional impairment, family Digital Object Identifier (DOI): http://dx.doi.org/10.13072/midss.231

Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science (MIDSS) - OCD Family Functioning (OFF) Scale - Patient Version

- 19/08/20 - 1 Formulário, 18 Grupos de itens, 122 Elementos de dados, 1 Idioma
Grupos de itens: General Information, Whom do you live with?, What types of treatment(s) have you tried for your OCD? (check all that apply), Have any of the following people been diagnosed with OCD? If so, who?, Do any of the following people have suspected OCD or Obsessive Compulsive symptoms? If so, who?, Information, Part 1 - Family Functioning Impairment, Part 1 - Family Functioning Impairment, Part 1 - Family Functioning Impairment, Part 1 - Family Functioning Impairment, Part 1 - Family Functioning Impairment, Part 1 - Family Functioning Impairment, Part 1 - Family Functioning Impairment, Part 1 - Family Functioning Impairment, Part 2 - Symptom-Specific Impairment, Part 2 - Symptom-Specific Impairment, Part 3 - Family Role-Specific Impairment, Part 3 - Family Role-Specific Impairment
Stewart, Hu, Hezel, Proujansky, Lamstein, Walsh, Ben-Joseph, Gironda, Jenike, Geller & Pauls. (2012). OCD Family Functioning (OFF) Scale. Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science. Retrieved 19.08.2020 from www.midss.ie Key references: Stewart, E. S., Hu, Y. P., Hezel, D. M., Proujansky, R., Lamstein, A., Walsh, C., … & Pauls, D. L. (2011). Development and psychometric properties of the OCD family functioning (OFF) scale. Journal of Family Psychology, 25, 434-443. Primary use / Purpose: The OFF was developed to explore the content, extent, and perspectives of functional impairment in families affected by OCD. Background: Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) often has a great impact on family functioning. Parents, and other family members, often become involved in the individual's ritualistic behaviours and family accomodation, either through enabling avoidance or assisting ritualistic behaviours, is very common. The OCD Family Functioning (OFF) Scale is a 42 item self-report questionnaire that consists of three major subscales: family functioning impairment, symptom-specific impairment, and family role-specific impairment. It is designed for use with families of adults and children with OCD. Two versions of the scale are available- a patient version and a relative version. The results of the scale may be used to assess family functioning and to help plan interventions and treatments. Scoring is described in Stewart et al. (2011). Psychometrics: The scale's psychometric properties are examined in Stewart et al. (2011). Keywords: Anxiety, Family, Stress Other keywords: obsessive compulsive disorder, OCD, functional impairment, family Digital Object Identifier (DOI): http://dx.doi.org/10.13072/midss.231

Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science (MIDSS) - Bath Adolescent Pain- Parental Impact Questionnaire (BAP-PIQ)

- 18/08/20 - 1 Formulário, 10 Grupos de itens, 64 Elementos de dados, 1 Idioma
Grupos de itens: Information, Section One, Section Two, Section Three, Section Four, Section Five, Section Six, Section Seven, Section Eight, Section Nine
Jordan, A., Eccleston, C., McCraken, L., Connell, H., Clinch, J.. (2008). The Bath Adolescent Pain – Parental Impact Questionnaire (BAP-PIQ). Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science. Retrieved 18.08.2020, from www.midss.ie Key references: Jordan, A., Eccleston, C., McCraken, L., Connell, H. and Clinch, J., (2008). The Bath Adolescent Pain – Parental Impact Questionnaire (BAP-PIQ): Development and preliminary psychometric evaluation of an instrument to assess the impact of parenting an adolescent with chronic pain. Pain, 137 (3), pp. 478-487 Primary use / Purpose: The BAP-PIQ measures the impact of an adolescent's chronic pain on their parents in terms of emotional and social functioning. It is a 62 item likert-type questionnaire. Background: The authors had previously created questionnaires assessing the impact of chronic pain on adolescents (Eccleston, Jordan, McCracken, Sleed, Connell,& Clinch, 2005). The Bath Adolescent Pain- Parental Impact Questionnaire extends this knowledge base by looking at how it impacts on the parents involved. Psychometrics: Reliability and Validity are confirmed in Jordan, Eccleston, McCraken, Connell, and Clinch (2008) Digital Object Identifier (DOI): http://dx.doi.org/10.13072/midss.211

Ajuda

Do you need help on how to use the search function? Please watch the corresponding tutorial video for more details and learn how to use the search function most efficiently.

Watch Tutorial