Search results - Portal of Medical Data Models (MDM-Portal)

Itemgroups: General Info, Current health limitations, Physical Health related problems during past 4 weeks, Emotional problems during past 4 weeks, Past 4 weeks, Emotions in past 4 weeks, General statements

This document contains the 36-Item Short Form Survey Instrument Version 1 (SF-36) form, developed at RAND as part of the Medical Outcomes Study. RAND owns the copyright. All of the surveys and tools from RAND Health are public documents, available without charge. For more information - e.g. on terms and conditions for use or scoring instructions: https://www.rand.org/health-care/surveys_tools/mos/36-item-short-form.html Changes made to the questionnaire should be made clearly identifiable.

HADS - Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

- 11/16/18 - 1 form, 1 itemgroup, 14 items, 1 language

Itemgroup: In the past week

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was originally developed by [Zigmond, AS; Snaith, RP (1983). "The hospital anxiety and depression scale". Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 67 (6): 361–370] and is commonly used by doctors to determine the levels of anxiety and depression that a patient is experiencing. Also used for routine documentation at the University Hospital Muenster (UKM) see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hospital_Anxiety_and_Depression_Scale

DLQI - Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)

- 9/7/16 - 1 form, 1 itemgroup, 12 items, 17 languages

Itemgroup: Skin problems past week

Details and Conditions of Use see: Finlay A.Y., Khan G.K. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) - A simple practical measure for routine clinical use. Clinical and Experimental Derm 1994; 19:210-16 Used as routine documentation at the University Hospital in Muenster (UKM).

Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science (MIDSS) - The Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer (CQOLC) scale

- 6/30/20 - 1 form, 2 itemgroups, 37 items, 1 language

Itemgroups: Administrative documentation, CAREGIVER QUALITY OF LIFE- CANCER

M. A. Weitzner, P. B. Jacobsen, H. Wagner Jr., J. Friedland, C. Cox. (1996). The Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer (CQOLC) scale. Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science. Retrieved 30.06.2020, from www.midss.ie Key references: McMillan, S. C. (1996). Quality of life of primary caregivers of hospice patients with cancer. Cancer Pract;4:191-8. Weitzner, M. A., Jacobsen, P. B., Wagner, H., Friedland, J., & Cox, C. (1999). The Caregiver Quality of Life Index–Cancer (CQOLC) Scale: development and validation of an instrument to measure quality of life of the family caregiver of patients with cancer. Quality of Life Research, 8, 55–63. Zarit, S. H., Reever, K. E., Bach-Peterson, J. (1980). Relatives of the impaired elderly: correlates of feeling of burden. Gerontologist;20:649 -55. Primary use / Purpose: The Caregiver Quality of Life Index- Cancer (CQOLC) scale is a 35-item cancer-specific instrument that assesses the carer of a cancer patient's quality of life, that is, some of the physical, social, emotional, and financial aspects of well-being, and functioning. Background: A panoply of instruments measuring caregiver burden have been developed since Zarit, Reever, and Bach-Peterson's (1980) pioneering study investigating carer strain using the Zarit Burden interview. Yet, a dearth of studies exist for parsing the physical, emotional, social and financial well-being of the carer. McMillan (1996) designed a valid and reliable caregiver quality of life index to study such constructs in the partner of the patient. Later, Weitzner and colleagues (1999) modified this scale to serve as a well-being outcome measure specifically for carers of cancer patients. Psychometrics: The CQOLC possesses acceptable validity, test-retest reliability and internal consistency (see Weitzner, Jacobsen, Wagner, Friedland, & Cox, 1999). Other Information: Scoring instructions: items 4, 10, 12, 16, 22, 27, 28 and 34 on questionnaire should be reversed scored. Digital Object Identifier (DOI): http://dx.doi.org/10.13072/midss.388

Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science (MIDSS) - Satisfaction With Life Scale-Child (SWLS-C)

- 6/25/20 - 1 form, 1 itemgroup, 5 items, 1 language

Itemgroup: Satisfaction With Life Scale-Child (SWLS-C)

Gadermann, A. M., Schonert-Reichl, K. A., & Zumbo, B. D. (2010). Satisfaction With Life Scale-Child (SWLS-C). Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science. Retrieved 25.06.2020, from www.midss.ie Key references: Gadermann, A. M., Schonert-Reichl, K. A., & Zumbo, B. D. (2010). Investigating validity evidence of the Satisfaction with Life Scale adapted for Children. Social Indicators Research, 96, 229-247. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75. Primary use / Purpose: The Satisfacation with Life Scale- Child (SWLS-C) is designed to measure children's judgements of their satisfaction with their life. Background: Gadermann et al. (2010) highlight several reasons why the study of children's life satisfaction is important. These include the development of a greater understanding of children's subjective well-being and its correlates, the monitoring of children's subjective well-being, and for the development of interventions to improve the well-being of children. Gadermann and colleagues (2010) adapted The Satisfaction with Life Scale (Diener, Emmons, Larsen, & Griffin, 1985), one of the most commonly used measures of life satisfaction in adults, for use with children between the ages of 9 and 14. The wording of the items and the response format was changed to make the scale more understandable for children. The resulting scale contains 5 items, each rated on a five-point likert scale from disagree a lot to agree a lot. Psychometrics: Gadermann et al. (2010) presents support for the psychometric properties of the instrument. SCORING: SWLS-C items are scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (“disagree a lot”) to 5 (“agree a lot”) then added together yielding a total score ranging from 5 to 25. Digital Object Identifier (DOI): http://dx.doi.org/10.13072/midss.270

Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science (MIDSS) - Contentment with Life Assessment Scale (CLAS)

- 5/14/20 - 1 form, 1 itemgroup, 5 items, 1 language

Itemgroup: Statements

Loraine F. Lavallee, P. Maurine Hatch, Alex C. Michalos, & Tara McKinley. (2007). Contentment with Life Assessment Scale (CLAS). Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science. Retrieved 14.05.2020, from www.midss.ie Key references: Lavallee, L. F., Hatch, P. M., Michalos, A. C., & McKinley, T. (2007). Development of the contentment with life assessment scale (CLAS): Using daily life experiences to verify levels of self-reported life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 83, 201-244. Primary use / Purpose: The CLAS is a brief 5-item index that assesses contentment, fulfillment, and self-discrepancies to give an overall indicator of life satisfaction and subjective well-being. Background: Perceived global satisfaction with one's life is generally thought to be above average. Lavallee and colleagues (2007), in their study, report that the average Anglo-American's life satisfaction may be more accurately described as neutral. The CLAS is a measure developed to assess life satisfaction to better understand differences in subjective well-being. Psychometrics: Test reliability are reported in Lavallee et al. (2007). Keywords: Anxiety, Family Digital Object Identifier (DOI): http://dx.doi.org/10.13072/midss.156

Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science (MIDSS) - The Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWL)

- 5/3/20 - 1 form, 1 itemgroup, 5 items, 1 language

Itemgroup: Statements

Pavot, W., & Diener, E.. (2013). The Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWL). Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science. Retrieved [03.05.2020], from www.midss.ie Author of Tool: Pavot, W., & Diener, E. Key references: Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75. Pavot, W. G., Diener, E., Colvin, C. R., & Sandvik, E. (1991). Further validation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale: Evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 149-161. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164-172. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The Satisfaction With Life Scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. ournal of Positive Psychology, 3, 137–152 Primary use / Purpose: The SWLS is a short 5-item instrument designed to measure global cognitive judgments of satisfaction with one's life. Background: The Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) has been used heavily as a measure of the life satisfaction component of subjective well-being. Scores on the SWLS have been shown to correlate with measures of mental health, and be predictive of future behaviours such as suicide attempts. In the area of health psychology, the SWLS has been used to measure the subjective quality of life of people experiencing serious health concerns. Psychometrics: The SWLS is a 7-point Likert style response scale. The possible range of scores is 5-35, with a score of 20 representing a neutral point on the scale. Scores between 5-9 indicate the respondent is extremely dissatisfied with life, whereas scores between 31-35 indicate the respondent is extremely satisfied. The coefficient alpha for the scale has ranged from .79 to .89, indicating that the scale has high internal consistency. The scale was also found to have good test-retest correlations (.84, .80 over a month interval). For a detailed psychometric description of the SWLS see: Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The Satisfaction With Life Scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. ournal of Positive Psychology, 3, 137–152. Keywords: Quality of Life Web link to tool: http://internal.psychology.illinois.edu/~ediener/SWLS.html Digital Object Identifier (DOI): http://dx.doi.org/10.13072/midss.467 Evaluation: 31 - 35 Extremely satisfied 26 - 30 Satisfied 21 - 25 Slightly satisfied 20 Neutral 15 - 19 Slightly dissatisfied 10 - 14 Dissatisfied 5 - 9 Extremely dissatisfied Understanding Scores on the Satisfaction with Life Scale (by Ed Diener) (Note: If we divide by the number of questions, rather than use the summed aggregate score, then the cutoffs below instead should be: 6-7 5-6 4-5 3-4 2-3 1-2 30 – 35 Very high score; highly satisfied Respondents who score in this range love their lives and feel that things are going very well. Their lives are not perfect, but they feel that things are about as good as lives get. Furthermore, just because the person is satisfied does not mean she or he is complacent. In fact, growth and challenge might be part of the reason the respondent is satisfied. For most people in this high-scoring range, life is enjoyable, and the major domains of life are going well – work or school, family, friends, leisure, and personal development. 25- 29 High score Individuals who score in this range like their lives and feel that things are going well. Of course their lives are not perfect, but they feel that things are mostly good. Furthermore, just because the person is satisfied does not mean she or he is complacent. In fact, growth and challenge might be part of the reason the respondent is satisfied. For most people in this high-scoring range, life is enjoyable, and the major domains of life are going well – work or school, family, friends, leisure, and personal development. The person may draw motivation from the areas of dissatisfaction. 20 – 24 Average score The average of life satisfaction in economically developed nations is in this range – the majority of people are generally satisfied, but have some areas where they very much would like some improvement. Some individuals score in this range because they are mostly satisfied with most areas of their lives but see the need for some improvement in each area. Other respondents score in this range because they are satisfied with most domains of their lives, but have one or two areas where they would like to see large improvements. A person scoring in this range is normal in that they have areas of their lives that need improvement. However, an individual in this range would usually like to move to a higher level by making some life changes. 15 – 19 Slightly below average in life satisfaction People who score in this range usually have small but significant problems in several areas of their lives, or have many areas that are doing fine but one area that represents a substantial problem for them. If a person has moved temporarily into this level of life satisfaction from a higher level because of some recent event, things will usually improve over time and satisfaction will generally move back up. On the other hand, if a person is chronically slightly dissatisfied with many areas of life, some changes might be in order. Sometimes the person is simply expecting too much, and sometimes life changes are needed. Thus, although temporary dissatisfaction is common and normal, a chronic level of dissatisfaction across a number of areas of life calls for reflection. Some people can gain motivation from a small level of dissatisfaction, but often dissatisfaction across a number of life domains is a distraction, and unpleasant as well. 10 – 14 Dissatisfied Peole who score in this range are substantially dissatisfied with their lives. People in this range may have a number of domains that are not going well, or one or two domains that are going very badly. If life dissatisfaction is a response to a recent event such as bereavement, divorce, or a significant problem at work, the person will probably return over time to his or her former level of higher satisfaction. However, if low levels of life satisfaction have been chronic for the person, some changes are in order – both in attitudes and patterns of thinking, and probably in life activities as well. Low levels of life satisfaction in this range, if they persist, can indicate that things are going badly and life alterations are needed. Furthermore, a person with low life satisfaction in this range is sometimes not functioning well because their unhappiness serves as a distraction. Talking to a friend, member of the clergy, counselor, or other specialist can often help the person get moving in the right direction, although positive change will be up the person. 5 – 9 Extremely Dissatisfied Individuals who score in this range are usually extremely unhappy with their current life. In some cases this is in reaction to some recent bad event such as widowhood or unemployment. In other cases, it is a response to a chronic problem such as alcoholism or addiction. In yet other cases the extreme dissatisfaction is a reaction due to something bad in life such as recently having lost a loved one. However, dissatisfaction at this level is often due to dissatisfaction in multiple areas of life. Whatever the reason for the low level of life satisfaction, it may be that the help of others are needed – a friend or family member, counseling with a member of the clergy, or help from a psychologist or other counselor. If the dissatisfaction is chronic, the person needs to change, and often others can help. Part that is common to each category To understand life satisfaction scores, it is helpful to understand some of the components that go into most people’s experience of satisfaction. One of the most important influences on happiness is social relationships. People who score high on life satisfaction tend to have close and supportive family and friends, whereas those who do not have close friends and family are more likely to be dissatisfied. Of course the loss of a close friend or family member can cause dissatisfaction with life, and it may take quite a time for the person to bounce back from the loss. Another factor that influences the life satisfaction of most people is work or school, or performance in an important role such as homemaker or grandparent. When the person enjoys his or her work, whether it is paid or unpaid work, and feels that it is meaningful and important, this contributes to life satisfaction. When work is going poorly because of bad circumstances or a poor fit with the person’s strengths, this can lower life satisfaction. When a person has important goals, and is failing to make adequate progress toward them, this too can lead to life dissatisfaction. A third factor that influences the life satisfaction of most people is personal – satisfaction with the self, religious or spiritual life, learning and growth, and leisure. For many people these are sources of satisfaction. However, when these sources of personal worth are frustrated, they can be powerful sources of dissatisfaction. Of course there are additional sources of satisfaction and dissatisfaction – some that are common to most people such as health, and others that are unique to each individual. Most people know the factors that lead to their satisfaction or dissatisfaction, although a person’s temperament – a general tendency to be happy or unhappy – can color their responses. There is no one key to life satisfaction, but rather a recipe that includes a number of ingredients. With time and persistent work, people’s life satisfaction usually goes up when they are dissatisfied. People who have had a loss recover over time. People who have a dissatisfying relationship or work often make changes over time that will increase their dissatisfaction. One key ingredient to happiness, as mentioned above, is social relationships, and another key ingredient is to have important goals that derive from one’s values, and to make progress toward those goals. For many people it is important to feel a connection to something larger than oneself. When a person tends to be chronically dissatisfied, they should look within themselves and ask whether they need to develop more positive attitudes to life and the world. Copyright by Ed Diener, February 13, 2006 Use is free of charge and granted by permission.

Lamotrigine as add-on therapy in patients with a clinical diagnosis of a Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (105-123) - Visit 7 / Final Assessment - Vital Signs; Physical Examination; Compliance; Quality of Life; Global Evaluation

- 9/23/19 - 1 form, 12 itemgroups, 67 items, 1 language

Itemgroups: Administrative, Vital Signs, Physical Examination, Physical Examination - Changes, Neurological Examination, Neurological Examination, Haematology , Clinical Chemistry , Plasma Concentrations of AEDs , Compliance Record, Quality of Life, Global Evaluation

Study ID: 105-123 Clinical Study ID: 105-123 Study Title: Lamotrigine as add-on therapy in patients with clinical diagnosis of a Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (severe generalised epilepsy of childhood onset.) A multicentre, double-blind, placebo controlled parallel group study Patient Level Data: Study Listed on ClinicalStudyDataRequest.com Sponsor: GlaxoSmithKline Phase: Phase 3 Study Recruitment Status: Completed Generic Name: Lamotrigine Study Indication: Seizures

Topotecan (HycamtinTM) with Carboplatin as First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients with Ovarian Cancer; 104864/612 - Prior to Seventh Cycle

- 8/13/19 - 1 form, 4 itemgroups, 7 items, 1 language

Itemgroups: Administrative documentation, Serious Adverse Event, Questionnaires, Quality of life, Clinical Trials, Status

Study ID: 104864/612 Clinical Study ID: 104864/612 Study Title: A Prospective, Open Label Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Topotecan (HycamtinTM) in Combination with Carboplatin as First-line Chemotherapy in Patients with Ovarian Cancer Patient Level Data: Study Listed on ClinicalStudyDataRequest.com Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: N/A Sponsor: GlaxoSmithKline Collaborators: N/A Phase: Phase 2 Study Recruitment Status: Completed Generic Name: Topotecan Trade Name: HycamtinTM Study Indication: Ovarian Cancer

Patient reported outcome measures in ATTR amyloidosis (short version) - PROMs ATTR short

- 7/26/19 - 1 form, 4 itemgroups, 32 items, 1 language

Itemgroups: Introduction, Demographic Factors, Patient reported outcomes: Quality of life, Patient reported outcomes: Disability

Patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) in patients with ATTR amyloidosis (short version) Version 1.0.0 Revised July 20th, 2019 Dr. med. Fabian Johannes Bolte Klinik für Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie Universitätsklinikum Münster Conditions: ATTR Amyloidosis Study Population: 2nd European Meeting for ATTR amyloidosis in Berlin This form is used for patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) in patients with ATTR amyloidosis to understand patients challenges and needs. Use of the following Scores for this standard set: (1) Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Short Form version 1.1 Global Health (PROMIS-10) (2) World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0)- 12-item Instrument

Keywords

Table of contents

Selected data models

258 Search results.

Contact