Keywords
Medical Oncology ×
Show more Keywords
Table of contents
  1. 1. Clinical Trial
  2. 2. Routine Documentation
  3. 3. Registry/Cohort Study
  4. 4. Quality Assurance
  5. 5. Data Standard
  6. 6. Patient-Reported Outcome
  7. 7. Medical Specialty
Selected data models

You must log in to select data models for download or further analysis.

- 6/30/20 - 1 form, 2 itemgroups, 37 items, 1 language
Itemgroups: Administrative documentation, CAREGIVER QUALITY OF LIFE- CANCER
M. A. Weitzner, P. B. Jacobsen, H. Wagner Jr., J. Friedland, C. Cox. (1996). The Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer (CQOLC) scale. Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science. Retrieved 30.06.2020, from www.midss.ie Key references: McMillan, S. C. (1996). Quality of life of primary caregivers of hospice patients with cancer. Cancer Pract;4:191-8. Weitzner, M. A., Jacobsen, P. B., Wagner, H., Friedland, J., & Cox, C. (1999). The Caregiver Quality of Life Index–Cancer (CQOLC) Scale: development and validation of an instrument to measure quality of life of the family caregiver of patients with cancer. Quality of Life Research, 8, 55–63. Zarit, S. H., Reever, K. E., Bach-Peterson, J. (1980). Relatives of the impaired elderly: correlates of feeling of burden. Gerontologist;20:649 -55. Primary use / Purpose: The Caregiver Quality of Life Index- Cancer (CQOLC) scale is a 35-item cancer-specific instrument that assesses the carer of a cancer patient's quality of life, that is, some of the physical, social, emotional, and financial aspects of well-being, and functioning. Background: A panoply of instruments measuring caregiver burden have been developed since Zarit, Reever, and Bach-Peterson's (1980) pioneering study investigating carer strain using the Zarit Burden interview. Yet, a dearth of studies exist for parsing the physical, emotional, social and financial well-being of the carer. McMillan (1996) designed a valid and reliable caregiver quality of life index to study such constructs in the partner of the patient. Later, Weitzner and colleagues (1999) modified this scale to serve as a well-being outcome measure specifically for carers of cancer patients. Psychometrics: The CQOLC possesses acceptable validity, test-retest reliability and internal consistency (see Weitzner, Jacobsen, Wagner, Friedland, & Cox, 1999). Other Information: Scoring instructions: items 4, 10, 12, 16, 22, 27, 28 and 34 on questionnaire should be reversed scored. Digital Object Identifier (DOI): http://dx.doi.org/10.13072/midss.388
- 6/23/20 - 1 form, 16 itemgroups, 48 items, 1 language
Itemgroups: Administrative, Serious Adverse Event, Serious Adverse Event (SAE) - Section 1, Serious Adverse Event (SAE) - Section 2 (Seriousness), Serious Adverse Event (SAE) - Section 3 (Demography Data), Serious Adverse Event (SAE) - Section 4 (If Investigational Product(s) was Stopped, Did the Reported Event(s) Recur After Further Investigational Product(s) were Administered?), Serious Adverse Event (SAE) - Section 5 (Possible Causes of SAE Other Than Investigational Product(s)), Serious Adverse Event (SAE) - Section 6 (Relevant Medical Conditions), Serious Adverse Event (SAE) - Section 7 (Other relevant Risk Factors) , Serious Adverse Event (SAE) - Section 8 (Relevant Concomitant Medications) , Serious Adverse Event (SAE) - Section 9 (Details of Investigational Product(s)), Was treatment blind broken at investigational site?, Serious Adverse Event (SAE) - Section 10 (Details of relevant Assessments), Serious Adverse Event (SAE) - Section 11 (Narrative Remarks) , Investigator’s signature, Serious Adverse Event (SAE) - Additional/ Follow-Up Information